The political platform of an Occupy-backed party

If the great Occupy movement can ever materialize into a real political party (one wonders why it hasn’t yet. The Tea Party was formed rather quickly on a lot less popular support), then what should be the main political agendas of this party?  Of course my personal wish is that the Occupy party should lean As Left As Possible. But that would no doubt alienate many of the Occupy participants as well.  Yet come to think of it. Why not? We are so Right at the moment that nothing will change for the better unless we go completely Left.

The Occupy Party’s political agenda should at least include:

  • Drastically decreased military spending
  • Drastically increased education spending across all levels
  • Phasing out US military installations in foreign countries
  • Nation-wide alternative energy mandate (including all governmental vehicles to be replaced by electronic ones)
  • Universal Health Care
  • Student Loan Remission — Take all the money that we are currently giving the banks, and redirecting them to pay back all the loans once and for all
  • Strong Wall Street & Banking sector regulation
  • Develop regional rail system
  • Increased taxes on the rich
  • Embrace intellectualism
  • No more corporate sponsorship in front of NCAA football bowls
  • Full transparency on the government’s relationships with big corporations, especially defense contractors such as Northrop Gruman; big oil, big pharm, big food.  We need to show that the government is not ruled according to the interests of the few who produce absolutely nothing that benefit humanity, but everything that creates sham profits and suffering.
Posted in Politics | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Tokyo FILMeX ’12: Kotoko Japanese premiere & review

Watching Kotoko is about as comforting as being stabbed by a fork. Incidentally, this is what happens to certain characters in the movie. A loud and violent close-quarter psychodrama, the Orizzonti Winner at this year’s Venice Fest, is sadly, a perfect example of joyless cinema. Who are the judges at Venice, I wonder?

Japanese pop star Cocco plays the title character, Kotoko, a single mother with a peculiar neurological condition-she sees double whenever she is holding her infant son, Daijiro. More frighteningly, every double is trying to pry the baby from her grasp, and this causes Kotoko to inflict fierce bursts of violence upon the poor person whose double is being seen. As a result, Daijiro is taken away put into the care of Kotoko’s sister in Okinawa.

Left alone, Kotoko’s existential doubt catapults her deeper into the abyss between reality and imagination. To escape from it, she often cuts herself with a razor, as seeing her skin drenched in blood is the only way to feel real. Somehow, this unstable Kotoko attracts the love of a novelist, Tanaka (played by Tsukamoto himself), who willingly bears all sorts of brutality that Kotoko performs on him. The more she hurts him, the more he loves her. Odd, but some masochists are like that.

However, just as the relationship seems to be developing into a companionship between two lonely souls, Tanaka abandons Kotoko, and what happens afterwards are more visuals of sadistic violence that all wrap up predictably, on a black screen and over the sound of Cocco singing.

Tsukamoto captures every act of self-harm and fighting in grisly detail, accompanied by overly loud sound effects, which together make the film excruciatingly hard on the senses and the mind. And since both the imagined and real world are punctured by such violence, it’s hard to figure out what’s what, and whether the different worlds have any importance anyway. Is everything all the imagination of Kotoko’s? Tsukamoto doesn’t make that clear, and he doesn’t care, as the excuse of imagination simply allows him to splatter more blood on screen at will.

Cocco’s pale face, with long eye brows and reflective eyes, carries the feeling of someone repressing deep pain, which certainly matches her character. However, her range of emotions never break out of the psychotic mode of the character either. And once we realize Tsukamoto has nothing to say about either motherhood or the trauma of neurosis, the movie becomes nothing but a squirmy sequence of manipulative violence.

It is really surprising that an apallingly violent and pointless film like this got the kind of reception FILMEX gave it. I thought it was supposed to be all about independent art films?

Posted in Film Criticism, Film Festivals, Film Reviews | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Tokyo FILMeX ’12 Day 4: Mr. Tree, あ、春, Cut

Mr. Tree – Dir. Han Jie

A movie of two halves, the first a conventional (but well done) and subtle film exposing the ironic follies of Chinese citizenry in the countryside, the second a jumble of an attempt to mix in personal history, satire and social criticism. Too many story threads are thrown in without proper development. While leading man Wang Bao Qiang gives a great absurdist/comic performance, whose quirky mannerisms perfect show a man tormented by external and interior pressures he cannot relieve of, the supporting cast are usually reduced to caricatures. A couple of cute love scenes aside, a romance between Wang and his female co-star Tan Zhuo lacks a convincing structure, thus wasting the sometimes great chemistry shown by the two.

Continue reading

Posted in Film Festivals, Film Reviews | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Tokyo FILMeX ’12 Day Two: Shinji Somai retrospective & OHIKKOSHI review

Besides a robust main competition line up, this year’s FILMeX is also noted for organizing retrospectives of two Japanese directors, who while popular domestically, are not very well known around the world. One of them is Shinji Somai, a director who made 15 movies between 1980 and 2001, before dying of lung cancer at the age of 53.

Shinji Somai and Tomoko Tabata

Continue reading

Posted in Film Festivals, Film Reviews | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

A powerful example of authentic & spontaneous documentary

Kudos to the students at UC Davis for enacting this to their chancellor. I just wish there were less cameras.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Tokyo FILMeX 2011 Opening Ceremony report & Arirang Review


The 12th Tokyo FILMeX opened on a typhoon day, but thankfully the torrential rain did not stop guests and filmgoers from packing the Toho Yurakuza theater for the opening ceremony. Quietly,Tokyo FILMeX has become Asia’s premiere film festivals focusing on independent movies, and a most cinephile-like given by the head of the jury, Amir Naderi, reinforces this aspiration, as he called the festival “his home” for having been here multiple times, and praised it as a “university” where people can watch “the roots of cinema” before giving personal recommendations to a few of the retrospectives at the festival, including one for Japanese auteur Shinji Somai.

(Curiously and somewhat awkwardly, for a festival that prides itself on its non-mainstream focus, 4 commercials played before the opening film. That’s right, TV commercials, which I’ve never seen done at any film festivals, however commercial their focuses are.)

The opening film that follows the Jury’s speech is Arirang, the latest work from Korean director Kim Ki Duk (famous for his provocative, but often misogynist thrillers), which already won in the Un Certain Regard section at Cannes this year. For a festival that prides itself on independent Asian cinema, it’s not surprising that Arirang was chosen as the opener, seeing how it was made by the director himself alone using a digital SLR. Yet at the same time, it is also puzzling that a film this pretentious and self-absorbent was chosen.

The story behind Arirang comes from Kim’s own life, who for the past three years (but that has apparently ended since this film went to Cannes) in an isolated mountain cabin, after a life-threatening accident on the set of his film Dreams, which seriously traumatized the director. So with the help of his tools, iMac, and Land Rover, Kim moved to the cabin and cut off all contact with the film industry in order to reflect on the accident and what it meant for his career. Apparently, after two and half years of a hermit-like lifestyle (he cooks rice using snow water, grills his own fish), Kim got the urge to film again. However, unable (or unwilling) to get back to the industry, he bought a camera and filmed self.

While Kim may think the accident was the lowest point of his career, Arirang begs to differ. Besides unremarkable shots of his mundane routine, which involves mostly drinking espresso and eating, the film’s mostly consisted of Kim asking himself questions, which he then answers from a different angle. Most of Kim’s questions are related to his own thoughts on his success, and he answers with obtuse philosophical meanderings that show a man with no mental clarity over his material nor his spiritual existence. Half way through the movie it has become a witless meta-film that challenges the audience to feel pity for a man who can’t stop adoring his past accomplishments (which is of course, defined by wins at major festivals). In one segment, we watch Kim, wrapped in a warm blanket, breaking out in tears as he watches a younger version of himself in a scene from Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter, and Spring. And this is followed by shots of stills of himself working, and pictures of his movie posters. Why? We have no idea except that Kim can’t seem to rid himself of his obsession with his achievements.

Different from a documentary, Arirang is made by a man who deliberately turns on a camera before each action. This style instills too much of a premeditated tone to the film, and thus depriving it of a naturalistic fluidity of more successful observational documentaries. Furthermore, Kim seems to have over-edited the film, and it’s replete with conventional cinematic cutaways that betray the confessional and solitary spirit of what he’s trying to get at. Kim is exposed as a man who relies too much on conventional cinematic method to make an anti-film, without understanding the irony of such endeavor.

The fact that Kim is too aware of himself being filmed and strikes a certain pose in response to the camera, makes it even harder to for us to feel the kind of sincerity he is trying to portray. Kim’s own tears glisten under the dim fluorescent light, but we can’t tell if they are genuine or created for the audience to see. Ultimately, the problem with Arirang is that in the face of greater travesties affecting the common man around the globe, Kim’s own concern with hubris seems helplessly trivial.

Posted in Film, Film Criticism, Film Festivals | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Hydrocide, another short film

Music performed by Jenny Chai.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Daily Praise, a short film

Based on poem of the same name by Annie Yu.
Original music composed by Nonagon

Posted in Film | Tagged , | Leave a comment

A romantic traditionalist’s view on photojournalism of today

Here is an article by a Russian photojournalist, whom I have never heard of before, that is his views on today’s ‘winning’ photojournalism.  His lamentations and critique sum up quite well how I feel about much of today’s popular photojournalism as well (including, but limited to, the over usage of a Canon 5D and 24mm 1.4 wide angle lens).

Obviously our Russian man here is a lover of art, and he speaks like Tolstoy in his authoritative, and bemoaning tone.  This is purely an article of emotions, not of facts.  You should not try to debate with him on photography.  Either you agree with him, or you don’t.  I agree with him.

Some memorable lines

The unifying theme [of winning World Press Photo] is the monotony of photographic forms, most of which are in a style of unconscious naivety and primitivism, series without beginning or end, lacking any generalization and categorizing but with a focus on exotic images from distant third world countries untouched by 21st century civilisation…Classic culture and art have been replaced by tawdry mystifications, exotic rites and vacation photos.

Posted in Photography | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Further elaborations on the decline of Hollywood

Here is another interesting read (from GQ magazine) that identifies a main culprit for the decline of Hollywood, without making too deep of a factual analysis.  Much of the article stems from acute cultural observation and emotional speculation, but all ring true and sensible to those who have been critical of Hollywood in recent times. The cinematic wit is gone in a lot of American filmmaking, replaced by heavy pondering, and a distinct, sad lack of genius in this current generation of filmmakers. What happened to the view of America as mythical, magical, gritty, supplied by a Westward wind of magic? Now we have bloated realism and embarassingly obtuse self reference, that treats any social movement as a superficial object in the continued manufacture of replacable gratifications.

This leads me, and maybe many of us to ask.  Where are the fresh story ideas, and where are the brilliant filmmakers who are able to tell them?  They are certainly not in multiplexes, but some of the films from this past year’s Sundance Fest show that there are still plenty of creative people trying new filmmaking methods, as well as new story concepts.  The problem, as delineated by the GQ article, is whether Studio marketing departments trust the films or respect the film-going audience enough, to give them the marketing support the films and filmmakers deserve.

His prognosis, is a flat out no. I agree with him, but only from my outsider perspective.  Nobody really knows what goes on inside the studio or the executives’ heads.  The big players (of actors and filmmakers)?  They have to play along just to get paid.

 

Posted in Film Criticism | Tagged , | Leave a comment